British Theatre
REVIEW: Love's Sacrifice, The Swan Theatre ✭✭
HomeNews & ReviewsREVIEW: Love's Sacrifice, The Swan Theatre ✭✭
22 April 2015 · 3 min read · 708 words

REVIEW: Love's Sacrifice, The Swan Theatre ✭✭

Despite a delicious design from Anna Fleischle (the black velvet floor and beautifully detailed costumes especially) and some winning, often charming, performances from Catrin Stewart, Jamie Thomas King, Andy Apollo, Colin Ryan and Matthew Needham, Dunster’s production does not establish any case for Love’s Sacrifice to be revived.

Andy ApolloAnna FleischleCatrin StewartColin RyanJamie Thomas KingJohn Ford

Love’s Sacrifice

The Swan Theatre

18 April 2015

2 Stars

In the programme for Matthew Dunster’s production of Love’s Sacrifice for the RSC, now playing at the Swan Theatre, Professor Martin White states:

“According to the title-page of the 1633 quarto, Love’s Sacrifice was ‘received generally well’ by the Phoenix audience…(but) there is no record of a professional performance of Love’s Sacrifice until this one in the Swan Theatre. Such neglect in itself is not unusual. Many early modern plays have lain forgotten or ignored for centuries, often because their subject matter was deemed unsuitable. Ford’s choice of topics across his plays (incest, adultery, witchcraft, butchery) was particularly challenging; in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries Love’s Sacrifice was judged to be lubricious and decadent…But it wasn’t just the content of a play that could damn it. A play simply might not conform to a particular period’s notion of what constituted a ‘play’. With Love’s Sacrifice, many critics have been confused by the deliberate inconsistencies in the characters’ behaviour or by the radical shifts in style and tone. None of these opinions on its content or its form had been measured against the play in performance. Though it may sound simplistic, the major reason that plays are not done is because they are not done. Consequently, they cannot develop a stage life, often have no place in the curricula of universities or schools, and there is frequently no easily accessible edition…All this can lend support to the jibe that if a play has been neglected then it must be because it’s no good. And yet how can that judgment be made until the play has been tested in action, in the theatre?”

Despite a delicious design from Anna Fleischle (the black velvet floor and beautifully detailed costumes especially) and some winning, often charming, performances from Catrin Stewart, Jamie Thomas King, Andy Apollo, Colin Ryan and Matthew Needham, Dunster’s production does not establish any case for Love’s Sacrifice to be revived.

It is not at all clear what the driving force behind this production is. It did not seem to be a connection with the text or language. Nor did it seem to be a concerted effort to place the production in its timeline, to recreate the kind of way it might have been performed when first written. Nor did it seem to be an attempt to breathe new life into the play or to refashion it in ways which would make it pulse with energy or connection to modern life.

The selection of this play for inclusion in a season at the Swan Theatre came about as a result of a dialogue between academics and the RSC, the academics pressing for a wider range of plays “contemporary” to Shakespeare to be programmed. That might be laudable, but, in truth, the RSC should only programme plays where there is something theatrical or lyrical or poetic (or all three!) about the plays which justifies the outlay and investment of effort, of both company and audience.

Currently in previews on Broadway is a new musical, Something Rotten, which concerns rivals to Shakespeare who lament that they cannot attract audiences in the shadow of the Bard. Perhaps those characters were based on John Ford? Earlier this year, a misconceived revival of another little known John Ford play, The Broken Heart, was programmed at the Sam Wanamaker Theatre. Both that production and this one make one think of Ford as a very poor imitator of Shakespeare.

Professor Martin White also says in the programme: “Ford’s work is distinctive for its frequent echoes of plays by other dramatists and its theatrical self-consciousness, and he expects his audience to ‘read’ his plays with that awareness.”

Perhaps.

Or perhaps Ford was a writer who wrote contemporary send-ups or pastiche variations on the work of others? Perhaps his works constituted quicksilver attempts to surf current waves of popularity and were not intended to stand the test of time – rather like a Downton Abbey sketch on Comic Relief?

All that can be clear is that Dunster’s production of Love’s Sacrifice does nothing to establish its value as a piece of theatre worth reviving - anywhere, anytime.

Love's Sacrifice runs until the 24th June at the Swan Theatre

S
Stephen Collins

Stephen Collins is a contributor at British Theatre, covering West End productions, London theatre news, casting updates, and UK stage trends.

Stay in the spotlight

Get the latest theatre news, reviews and exclusive offers straight to your inbox.

Shows mentioned

More from Stephen Collins

guides

Best West End Shows Under £30 in 2026

A practical guide to the West End shows that still offer real value in 2026, with eight strong options for budgets below the £30 mark.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

Connor's score owes a considerable debt to Sondheim, but, that said, it treads in very interesting paths. Complex and intricate, the melodies and harmonies reward careful listening, but there is no danger of a "hummable tune" for the most part, even though individual numbers and vocal lines are quite beguiling, instantly enjoyable.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Barker's play is extraordinary, especially given that it was written over a century ago and revised by him in the late 20’s, the original having been banned from performance. The notions and complex philosophies which underline the narrative are as fresh, vital and important now as then. The need to invest in the future, to educate the young properly. The hopelessness of political cabals. The marginalisation of women. Double-standards in public life. The dirty compromises of party politics. The terror a true rebel with a proper cause can create in the complacent and borne to rule.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Related articles

REVIEW: The Jew Of Malta, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Jew Of Malta, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

This is a play where the inhabitants of a Nunnery are slain by poisoned porridge; where the daughter of a Jew becomes a Christian Nun, twice; where, having purchased a Thracian slave, owner and slave engage in a bout of one-upmanship about the vile deeds they claim to enjoy; where Friars are referred to as "religious caterpillars"; where the Jew inquires if theft is the basis of Christianity; where a Friar casually asks if the Jew has been "crucifying children"; and where no one, really, has any redeeming features. It all but screams farce, even if some of the subject matter is repugnant and, sadly, deadly accurate.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Volpone, Swan Theatre ✭✭

News

REVIEW: Volpone, Swan Theatre ✭✭

Henry Goodman is assured and magnetic as the titular Volpone. He gives a larger than life performance which suits - entirely - Johnson's larger than life character. In the extreme, absurd comedy, Goodman is very good indeed. His fake almost-dead patient is a riot, not the least because when Goodman has his wig and hospital gear in full flight, he bears an uncanny resemblance to Worzel Gummidge as played by Jimmy Savile. There is something splendidly repulsive yet unsettlingly endearing about him in this mode.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Death Of A Salesman, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Death Of A Salesman, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭

The role of Willy Loman is very exacting, requiring great range and subtlety from the actor. The single greatest requirement, though, is for the actor to be Loman rather than to play him; there needs to be total immersion in the character, and the character's different stages. It must be possible to see the Loman who so enthralled and impressed his sons, the Loman who believed in the Dream and to contrast that against the Loman who is engulfed, diminished, destroyed. Antony Sher gives a prickly, vigorous, erratically explosive performance. He might wear Loman’s skin but he never gets under it.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Love's Labour's Won, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Love's Labour's Won, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Christopher Luscombe's very funny version of the Beatrice/Benedick show complete with magnificent, period set (Simon Highlett), some fabulous costumes, Nigel Hess' delightful music and Jenny Arnold's joyful movement. Setting the play in the post-World War 1 period works nicely; the sense of changing times is entirely appropriate. It's a gentle but frisky time and you can almost hear the approach of the flappers.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Shoemaker's Holiday, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Shoemaker's Holiday, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Breen squeezes every bit of comedic possibility from the play. The repertory company, so good in the dramatic and enthralling Oppenheimer, prove to be equally skilled in the bawdy comedy department. There are sly asides, vicious insults, dirty double entendres, rowdy gags, silly accent routines, fart jokes, catch-phrase jollity, physical comedy, costume comedy, sight gags, clowning - you name it, it can be found in Breen's lucid, fast-moving and hugely enjoyable production.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Christmas Truce, RSC ✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Christmas Truce, RSC ✭✭

The greatest disappointment here is the missed opportunity. The RSC could have created a masterful work that gave great insight into the remarkable events of that Belgian December 1914. Instead, they settled for The Christmas Truce.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Type to search...