British Theatre
REVIEW: The Importance Of Being Earnest, Harold Pinter Theatre (0 Stars)
HomeNews & ReviewsREVIEW: The Importance Of Being Earnest, Harold Pinter Th...
20 July 2014 · 3 min read · 734 words

REVIEW: The Importance Of Being Earnest, Harold Pinter Theatre (0 Stars)

Lucy Bailey has presided over a fraud - this is not Wilde's play and it doesn't pretend to be when you are in your expensive seat. But to lure you to pay for the ticket, it masquerades as Wilde's wonderfully witty and practically perfect play.

Lucy BaileyOscar WildeReviewsThe Importance Of Being Earnest

The Importance Of Being Earnest. Photo: Tristram Kenton The Importance Of Being Earnest Harold Pinter Theatre 19 July 2014 0 Stars Now playing at the Harold Pinter Theatre is a play, conceived and directed by Lucy Bailey, aided and abetted by designer William Dudley and writer Simon Brett, which pretends to be The Importance Of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde.

It is not.

Indeed, it is about as far away from the piece of perfect, absurd confection that Wilde's masterpiece is as Adolph Hitler is from Nelson Mandella.

People who have purchased tickets thinking they are to experience Wilde's glorious trivial comedy for serious people should demand refunds. Because Bailey has not attempted to direct that play. To ascribe anything happening on the Harold Pinter Stage to Wilde is to obfuscate and lie - this is not The Importance of Being Earnest.

It's a stupid, vacuous play about an old group of amateur thespians rehearsing a production of Wilde's great play. As a concept, woeful does not come close.

In the programme, Bailey and Dudley are quoted as taking inspiration from, of all things, Tom Stoppard's magnificent Arcadia:

"In Arcadia, there are two distinct worlds in the one unchanging house, separated by a gap of nearly 200 years. Both occupy the stage, unaware of each other's presence. We remember it being done so fluidly and brilliantly - the way in which one generation would appear just as the other left the stage. It was very moving, and we hope we can achieve something similar as we shift the action from 2014 back to 1895".

This is so profoundly stupid as to be almost inconceivable. Stupid, inconceivable plagiarism.

Arcadia was written specifically to have the one house shared by two distinct groups, one of whom, the researchers, were constantly aware of and thinking about the other group - the Lord Byron contemporaries.

Wilde wrote a play about fictional characters. Bailey and Dudley have created a play and a set with their own characters - a group of amateur actors rehearsing Wilde's great play. There are not two distinct groups on the one set: there is one group on the one set doing two different things. It has nothing to do with Arcadia and it is absurd to suggest it does, to feebly seek to grab the cloak of respectability through the Stoppard door.

The gifted Michael Frayn has already delivered a comic masterpiece about the way backstage shenanigans can impact upon live theatre. It's called Noises Off. Simon Brett's tawdry and singularly unfunny claptrap here poses no problems for Frayn's legacy.

So - it's not Wilde, not Stoppard and not Frayn.

It's just rubbish. Masquerading as The Importance of Being Earnest.

And it's ageist and horrendously condescending to the many many good people who do excellent work in unpaid community theatre.

Bailey should have just let the cast do the job, play the roles which Wilde wrote. As Judi Dench proved so effortlessly in A Midsummers' Night Dream at the Rose Kingston, age does not necessarily mean a performer is precluded from playing a role generally played by younger persons.

There are traces of excellence about many of the performances, but because they have to play non-professionals playing the Wildean characters, the audience never actually gets to see the Wildean characters. The non-professional characters get in the way.

Siân Phillips could have been a splendid Lady Bracknell, as, indeed, could Cherie Lunghi. Lunghi could have been a glorious Gwendolyn, but not when doing the nonsense Bailey has her do as the former National Theatre actress, Maria. Both Nigel Havers (Algernon) and Martin Jarvis (Jack) might have been okay if they were just playing Wilde, and the same goes for Niall Buggy (Canon Chasuble) and Rosalind Ayres (Miss Prism). The others...not so much.

But this is not Wilde - and it is certainly not The Importance Of Being Earnest.

More accurately, it might be called Earnestly Trying To Be Important or The Importance Of Being Earnest in Rehearsal by the Bunbury Players.

Patrons should demand their money back.

Because Lucy Bailey has presided over a fraud - this is not Wilde's play and it doesn't pretend to be when you are in your expensive seat.

But to lure you to pay for the ticket, it masquerades as Wilde's wonderfully witty and practically perfect play.

It's an absolute disgrace.

Book tickets for The Importance Of Being Earnest

S
Stephen Collins

Stephen Collins is a contributor at British Theatre, covering West End productions, London theatre news, casting updates, and UK stage trends.

Stay in the spotlight

Get the latest theatre news, reviews and exclusive offers straight to your inbox.

Shows mentioned

Rose placeholder artwork

sunday-performances

£0

More from Stephen Collins

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

Connor's score owes a considerable debt to Sondheim, but, that said, it treads in very interesting paths. Complex and intricate, the melodies and harmonies reward careful listening, but there is no danger of a "hummable tune" for the most part, even though individual numbers and vocal lines are quite beguiling, instantly enjoyable.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Barker's play is extraordinary, especially given that it was written over a century ago and revised by him in the late 20’s, the original having been banned from performance. The notions and complex philosophies which underline the narrative are as fresh, vital and important now as then. The need to invest in the future, to educate the young properly. The hopelessness of political cabals. The marginalisation of women. Double-standards in public life. The dirty compromises of party politics. The terror a true rebel with a proper cause can create in the complacent and borne to rule.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: All On Her Own - Harlequinade, Garrick Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: All On Her Own - Harlequinade, Garrick Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

The revival of Harlequinade, directed by Branagh and Ashford, now playing at the Garrick Theatre (in a 100 minute experience that includes All On Her Own and no intervals) is something of a revelation. Mostly, Harlequinade is seen in conjunction with The Browning Version, one of Rattigan’s masterpieces, usually as a curtain raiser. To my mind, that combination has never worked and Harlequinade has always seemed pale and irksome by comparison with The Browning Version. But, here, released from the curtain raiser position, placed directly in the spotlight, splendidly set up by the intense darkness of All On Her Own, the play can shine.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Related articles

Type to search...