British Theatre
REVIEW: King John, Globe Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭
HomeNews & ReviewsREVIEW: King John, Globe Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭
15 June 2015 · 7 min read · 1,701 words

REVIEW: King John, Globe Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

James Dacre takes full advantage of the play's many moods and shifts of emphasis and style, with the result that the evening is rambunctious and thoroughly engaging: something like a political roller-coaster ride. This is a play where it is hard to work out who the real villain might be - there are a number of contenders for that appellation. But the real benefit of Dacre's production is that the characters get full value, and what rich and rewarding characters they turn out to be.

Alex WaldmannAruhan GalievaBarbara MartenCiarán OwensDaniel RabinJames Dacre

King John

Shakespeare's Globe Theatre

10 June 2015

5 Stars

William Shakespeare wrote ten plays about the tumultuous monarchies which reigned over England: Richard II, Henry IV (1 and 2), Henry V, Henry VI (1, 2 and 3), Richard III, Henry VIII and King John. The latter, thought to have been written after Richard II and before Henry IV Part 1, is rarely done, at least in comparison to the others. This suggests that the play has "issues". But does it?

On the strength of James Dacre's production, currently playing at the Globe, the answer is a resounding "No".

Surprisingly, this is the first time King John has been tackled at the Globe since it opened in 1997. It has been worth the eighteen year wait. Dacre's production sizzles with energy, tells the convoluted political tale with clarity and humour, and revels in the excesses the characters and plot twists and turns provide. Slightly naughtily, there are lines added to Shakespeare's play from The Troublesome Reign of King John, King of England, a play possibly written by George Peele. But these additions are neither jarring nor otiose, and the end result is a romp through a tense time for Anglo-French relations told through the very specific prism of the post-Henry VIII split with Rome, awash with venom, betrayal and strategic gambits.

Nicholas Hytner famously remarked that Shakespeare could be unintelligible: "The first five minutes is always tricky" he told the Cheltenham Literary Festival in 2013. Dacre's production proves Hytner wrong, if proof be needed. The singular clarity in delivery from all of the actors in the company makes this one of the most readily understood productions of Shakespeare seen at the Globe. This is not just about enunciation and audibility; the company here lives and breathes the language, turning it to full advantage, drawing the audience into their confidence, to their support. It's rhetoric in full blooded action.

As it plays out, the play seems startlingly relevant. The conflict between classes, the failure of the governing body to have the support of the country, the willingness of that body to turn against its allies for short term gains, threats from the rich and powerful to keep the governing body in check, uneasy alliances and unfriendly coalitions; add poisonous personal attacks and unabashed selling out and you have not just the meat and bones of King John but a caustic overview of the recent UK elections.

In the programme, Professor Leon Black argues the case for the play to be better regarded:

"Unconnected with the double tetralogy on the Yorks and Lancasters, bearing little resemblance to what we are taught of John in school (Magna Carta is never mentioned), it looks like a neglected step-child. It should be more noticed, for,it contains splendid things - among others, a notable diversity of tones, including the patriotic, the conspiratorial, the shocking, and the ludicrous. It gives directors and actors a wide range of choices."

Professor Black is spot on.

Dacre takes full advantage of the play's many moods and shifts of emphasis and style, with the result that the evening is rambunctious and thoroughly engaging: something like a political roller-coaster ride. This is a play where it is hard to work out who the real villain might be - there are a number of contenders for that appellation. But the real benefit of Dacre's production is that the characters get full value, and what rich and rewarding characters they turn out to be.

Jo Stone-Fewings is in spectacular form as the titular King John; I have never seen him better than he is here. He subtly evokes the sense of the cartoon version of the character, the Peter Ustinov silky voiced lion from Disney's Robin Hood, and is venal, capricious, thoughtful, majestic, quick-witted, pitiful and grotesque. He is wonderful to watch and his use of his richly dark-toned voice is masterful - he can flick from whiny comedy to blustering rage in the blink of an eye.

As a whole, his John is rather like Richard II 1/2 - a character that sits somewhere between the extremes of Richards II and III, with characteristics and attitudes common to both or one. Yet, Stone-Fewings' John is wholly unique at the same time; a point of singularity that blazes in its own way. It's a powerful, engaging and completely convincing portrayal - one that will set the standard for a long time to come.

A small quibble arises over the manner and matter of John's death. It seems here to be too neat, over too quickly and without scale or an essential level of hideousness. John was, after all, poisoned in the play; in life, dysentery claimed him. Either way, it wasn't pretty. Depriving Stone-Fewings of a degrading, appalling death by poisoned rotting bowels takes some sheen off the performance. He has worked so hard, made John so real, the final, ghastly death rattle should not see him depart with a whimper. But it's a tiny blot on Dacre's copy book; it merely deprives the audience of seeing just how good Stone-Fewings could have been.

Alex Waldmann continues to increase in stature as a classical actor. He is a wonderful Bastard here - noble of spirit, courageous, rowdy, brash, quick-tongued, fiery and audacious. A Bastard's bastard. Everything the illegitimate son of the crusading Richard The Lionheart would be expected to be. All man and mouth, quick with a sword, and deadly - on the battlefield and off. A joker and anything but a joke. Waldmann gains the audience's favour easily and charts his character's rise in stature to match Stone-Fewing's John's fall. It's a mature, cocky and impressive performance. His final scene is magnificently touching.

As the matriarch of all matriarchs, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Barbara Marten shows a spirt and agility of wit and manoeuvring that certainly makes one wonder if James Goldman took his cue for The Lion In Winter from Shakespeare. Goldman's Eleanor and Shakespeare's have much in common, and Marten fleshes out every morsel of the feast for an actress that Shakespeare's pen provides. Regal, haughty, manipulative, but always electrifying, Marten delights in the dangerous games Eleanor incites and assists. Her eyes communicate pages of words with quick, penetrating glances. Completely real and understandable, Marten's Eleanor shows what a terrific role this is for an actress of skill.

Marten's Eleanor is made all the more intoxicating because of the small scene where Marten plays a different character - Lady Faulconbridge, mother of the Bastard. Here, Marten is entirely different, almost as though another actress was playing the part. Broken, sorrowful, resentful, hurt, humiliated - Marten is terrific. And Lady Faulconbridge an important spoke on the ever turning wheel of fortune. It is she who acknowledges the Bastard's progenitor, despite the cost to her reputation, and thus it is she who sets her son upon the course that will see him rise in stature and rank, beyond his dreams.

Tanya Moodie is an outstanding Constance, mother to Arthur, the son of John's deceased older brother, Geoffrey. Arthur's claim to the English throne is perhaps as tenable as John's, and Constance wants him crowned. Moodie can trade insults with the best and has no difficulty matching Marten or Stone-Fewing barb for barb. She plays Constance as mother first, mother of the crown second. In this, she is the mirror opposite of Eleanor, for whom power is all important. The look on Moodie's face as Arthur is taken away is extraordinary, a Renaissance painting of honestly felt devastation, and she handles the lament over her son's fate with bristling, brutal intensity.

As the devious, duplicitous and determined Cardinal Pandulph, Joseph Marcell shines like a jewel on the Pope's hand. Unflappable in the face of the unrestrained, his crafty Cardinal wields power without hesitation; an excommunication here, an excommunication there - anything to maintain Rome's supremacy, and bring the Will of the Pope into fruition. It is hilarious that the most Machiavellian character here is the Cardinal, but that reflects the views of Shakespeare's times entirely and leads to laughs, now as well as then. In a modern reading, you could almost see the Cardinal as the embodiment of the European Union or the Banking World: he is an enemy to some, a friend to others, and backed by tremendous, well funded power.

One of the play's most difficult scenes comes when Hubert (Mark Meadows) comes to blind Arthur (Laurence Belcher) with red-hot pokers and kill him but the lad talks him out of it. It's a hard scene to make work, unless there is a disturbing paedophilic undertone given to the proceedings. But here, with both fine actors playing it entirely for real, with conscience and consequence being the cudgels of the debate, it works spectacularly. You are certain the boy will be blinded; then you understand why Hubert refuses to do the dark deed - and this sets up the eventual fate of Arthur to be cripplingly sad, rather than ludicrously silly.

There are no weak links in the cast and Simon Coates, Ciarán Owens and Daniel Rabin do especially fine, thoughtful work. As does Aruhan Galieva in two very different roles: she is a surprised bride when the spotlight of negotiations turns to her Blanche of Castile, a spanish princess; and, later, as a bizarre and slightly feral Peter of Pomfret, she brings the sense of one of Macbeth's witches or Caesar's soothsayer to proceedings.

Orlando Gough's original music works particularly well, and adds significantly to mood and tone. Scott Ambler provides deft movement and the stylised fight sequences (Rachel Bown-Williams and Ruth Cooper-Brown) are very impressive - more impressive, actually, than any fully staged sequence would be likely to be. Jonathan Fensom's set design makes excellent use of the stage, and the platforms he sets amongst the groundlings, and the central ramp where Arthur finally goes to God, all work well.

This is a truly engrossing, fascinating and thrilling production of one of Shakespeare’s ugly ducklings. James Dacre and his exemplary cast, led by Stone-Fewings, Marten, Waldmann and Moodie, entirely make the case for King John to be seen as a true Swan.

King John runs until June 27, 2015 at Shakespeare's Globe

S
Stephen Collins

Stephen Collins is a contributor at British Theatre, covering West End productions, London theatre news, casting updates, and UK stage trends.

Stay in the spotlight

Get the latest theatre news, reviews and exclusive offers straight to your inbox.

Shows mentioned

More from Stephen Collins

guides

Best West End Shows Under £30 in 2026

A practical guide to the West End shows that still offer real value in 2026, with eight strong options for budgets below the £30 mark.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

Connor's score owes a considerable debt to Sondheim, but, that said, it treads in very interesting paths. Complex and intricate, the melodies and harmonies reward careful listening, but there is no danger of a "hummable tune" for the most part, even though individual numbers and vocal lines are quite beguiling, instantly enjoyable.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Barker's play is extraordinary, especially given that it was written over a century ago and revised by him in the late 20’s, the original having been banned from performance. The notions and complex philosophies which underline the narrative are as fresh, vital and important now as then. The need to invest in the future, to educate the young properly. The hopelessness of political cabals. The marginalisation of women. Double-standards in public life. The dirty compromises of party politics. The terror a true rebel with a proper cause can create in the complacent and borne to rule.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Related articles

REVIEW: Bakkhai, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Bakkhai, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

This is Whishaw's show - no question. He is a force of nature, fiercely unearthing every moment of nuance, humour and purpose from the text and giving a totally committed, undeniably powerful and persuasive performance. Every moment is fascinating, thought through and skilfully played. Dionysius was the God of the theatre, as well as wine, song and dance. Whishaw makes this part of the very fabric of his turn as the vengeful God, and offsets that performance with two remarkable cameos - as Tieresias and the Messenger. He is magical in every way.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Farinelli And The King, Sam Wanamaker Playhouse ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Farinelli And The King, Sam Wanamaker Playhouse ✭✭✭✭

It is a slight, but quite beautiful, play, perfectly suited to the intimate grandeur of the space, and quite intoxicating, so perfectly judged is everything about it. . The gifted Sam Crane takes on the acting burden of Farinelli , but when it comes time to sing, he is either joined onstage or replaced there by Purefoy, costumed precisely to match Crane. Purefoy has a strong, rich and agile counter-tenor. He is a delight to hear.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Changeling, Sam Wanamaker Playhouse ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Changeling, Sam Wanamaker Playhouse ✭✭✭✭

Dromgoole’s production is detailed and clear, effortlessly moving from the sombre and macabre world of Beatrice-Joanna to the lighter, albeit equally odd, world of Isabella. Hattie Morahan is sheer delight as Beatrice-Joanna. Sarah MacRae is a luminous actress and her work here as Isabella adds further to the lustrous work she delivers.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Merchant Of Venice, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Merchant Of Venice, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

Tom Scutt's design is overwhelmingly attractive. Seductive blue and gold enhances the structures where the action occurs - a garishly compelling sense of Venice and Las Vegas: time and space are fused in the bauble land where Antonio and Shylock take their commercial risks. Greed and choice become the central focus here.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Hamlet, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Review

REVIEW: Hamlet, Almeida Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Alas poor Sherlock, we know it well. Even in the opening scenes of this ingenious production, it was clear that Andrew Scott would more than match his TV co-star Cumberbatch.

Danny Coleman-Cooke

Danny Coleman-Cooke

News & Reviews

Type to search...